Major Spoilers
    Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Twitch Discord RSS
    Major Spoilers
    • Home
    • Reviews
      • Random Access Memory
      • Retro Review
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Podcasts
      • Critical Hit
        • Critical Hit House Rules
        • Critical Hit World Building
      • Dueling Review
      • Finally Friday
      • Geek History Lesson
      • The Legion Clubhouse
      • Major Spoilers Podcast
        • MSP TPB for 2019
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2013
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2012
        • On the Next Major Spoilers Podcast – 2011
      • Munchkin Land
      • Top Five
      • Wayne’s Comics
      • Zach on Film
    • Features
      • Casual 60
      • Comic Casting Couch
      • Comics Portal
      • Did You Hear?
      • Editorials
      • Features
      • Gamer’s Corner
      • Hero Histories
      • Let’s Get Nerdy
      • Major Spoilers Adventures
      • Random Access Memory
      • So You Want to Read Comics
    • Movies
      • Did You Hear
      • Movies
      • Television
    • Comic Previews
    • Patreon
      • Patreon
      • Store
    Major Spoilers
    adrianne palicki wonder womanTHUMB
    DC

    TELEVISION: NBC kicks Wonder Woman to the curb

    Stephen SchleicherBy Stephen SchleicherMay 12, 201125 Comments1 Min Read

    adrianne palicki wonder woman

    Looks like we won’t get to see David E. Kelley’s take on Wonder Woman, as NBC has decided to pass on the show, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

    The drama, produced by Warner Bros. TV, is a reinvention of the iconic DC comic in which Wonder Woman (Adrianne Palicki) is a vigilante crime-fighter in Los Angeles but also a successful corporate executive trying to balance all the elements of her extraordinary life. Joining Palicki is Elizabeth Hurley, Tracie Thoms and Cary Elwes. Jeff Reiner (The Event) directed the pilot.

    Part of the reason for the pass is lackluster buzz surrounding the show, which, if you’ve been reading this site for any length of time, you know that translates to utter hatred for the idea, look, and concept of the show from many of the Intardwebz people.

    With Wonder Woman and Locke & Key getting let go, I guess we’ll all have to satiate ourselves with another season of Chuck.

    via The Hollywood Reporter

    adrianne palicki david e. kelley dc comics NBC Television Wonder Woman
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleREVIEW: Flashpoint #1 (of 5)
    Next Article VIDEO: A quick look at Green Lantern: Emerald Knights
    Stephen Schleicher
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Stephen Schleicher began his career writing for the Digital Media Online community of sites, including Digital Producer and Creative Mac covering all aspects of the digital content creation industry. He then moved on to consumer technology, and began the Coolness Roundup podcast. A writing fool, Stephen has freelanced for Sci-Fi Channel's Technology Blog, and Gizmodo. Still longing for the good ol' days, Stephen launched Major Spoilers in July 2006, because he is a glutton for punishment. You can follow him on Twitter @MajorSpoilers and tell him your darkest secrets...

    Related Posts

    The Flash #27 Review

    Read More

    Batman/Green Arrow/The Question: Arcadia #1 Review

    Read More

    DC Vertigo for February 2026

    Read More

    25 Comments

    1. @lantis on May 13, 2011 12:35 am

      I think NBC is the only network actually aware of the power the internet can provide to making a show successful. They were the first to reliably have episodes of their prime time shows up on their website the next day. They have fully embraced the fact that Chuck won’t win its time slot in the ratings, but has a dedicated fan-base that uses the internet to organize. And now they are smart enough to realize that the Wonder Woman TV show was struggling before it even aired to gain support from the demographic most inclined to actually like the show. As much as I was curious to see the pilot, I think NBC made a sound business decision.

      I am a little worried though of the power this gives a bunch of internet whiners though. Scream loud enough and apparently the higher-ups will indulge you.

      I also like to imagine that one of the NBC execs making the decision was familiar enough with Wonder Woman to also be upset with the take David E Kelley was trying to pull off.

      • Arbor Day on May 13, 2011 1:57 am

        Don’t give them that much credit. NBC is skittish cause they’re on their last leg after throwing all their weight behind Heroes a few years ago. The only reason they’re jumping on the internet bandwagon is cause they’re desperate to get any money they can.

        • @lantis on May 13, 2011 12:37 pm

          Not really a fair assessment. NBC is not as bad off as it once was a few years ago. They’ve mostly reclaimed their “Must See TV” style dominance for Thursday nights, and Mondays are consistently acceptable ratings given that their competing against such a dominant show like “House.”

          They aren’t really “jumping on the internet bandwagon” either. NBC has a history of listening to what an internet fanbase has to say when it comes to their shows. “Chuck” is still around because of internet efforts. The experienced the opposite for WW, so they cut their losses.

          • Arbor Day on May 13, 2011 10:43 pm

            Tell that to Conan O’Brien.

      • websnap on May 13, 2011 11:43 am

        “I am a little worried though of the power this gives a bunch of internet whiners though. Scream loud enough and apparently the higher-ups will indulge you.”

        Yeah, this singlehandedly killed the show, I hope it surfaces online — or even better, another network, like say ScyFy picks it up instead. Most of what killed this show was rumours, early plot leeks (like those are ever any good) and fanboy/girl bias. Unfortunate, Wonder Woman needs representation. The strong, powerful warrior from the comics, not the skewed version some remember from the old show. It’s sad people got hung up on her costume, like all a female hero is what she wears.

        • Ricco on May 13, 2011 3:20 pm

          The costume wasn’t the problem this new “re-invention” was, costume was fine specialy since they changed the original shiny pants and color of the boots. Read back on the hate the show got an it started the second this re-invention by David E. Kelley’s had such scenes as WW eating a bucket of ice cream while crying in her PJs. Don’t know about you but it doesn’t scream princess of the Amazons or powerful female role model, heck they have her as a “modern woman”, which is pretty much what WW is not. She has always been depoicted as more alien to the modern world then the actual aliens…

          P.S. We also see her run (not fly) in the few pics we got and no mention of any powers or Amazon origins for that matter. I approached many people, some who have knowledge of comic books other who don’t, I said a “well known DC super heroine who is a a modern business woman and a vigilante by night is getting a TV show, guess who it is” No one said WW, heck one said “the only DC heroine I know is WW, but that can’t possibly be it”. This was many things, WW however, it was not.

    2. Joonas on May 13, 2011 3:23 am

      Although @lantis put it very well, but here’s my abridged version, khm, OH YES THER ACTUALLY IS A GOD!!
      That is all.

    3. Mela on May 13, 2011 4:43 am

      After hearing how the pilot was largely her going around killing each & every foe (which even my father found appalling), I am so damn relieved. The whole project just seemed like an unsold idea with a thin coat of Wonder Woman on it to make it sellable, and I’m glad they passed.

    4. brenton8090 on May 13, 2011 6:12 am

      Good. Can we get around to that movie now? IT seems sexist that Batman and Superman get them, but Wonder Woman is continually relegated to the small screen.

      Okay, maybe not actually sexist, but I want to see a thoughtful big budget version of Wonder Woman, not another Smallville or Bionic Woman.

    5. MaximusRift on May 13, 2011 7:13 am

      I also think the failure of “The Cape” has something to do with this.

      • Damascus on May 23, 2011 5:37 am

        I thought that show was doomed the moment I first heard the title. Then the plot synopsis sealed it for me. What’s funny is that I was more interested in No Ordinary Family than I was in The Cape (well, until I saw an episode of No Ordinary Family). Honestly at this point, I’ll take Heroes back, I’d rather have a slightly well done superhero-type show than what’s been on lately.

    6. steviecool on May 13, 2011 7:33 am

      While I’d love to think that Hollywood realized “maybe we can’t pull in the fanbase without completely pissing off the fanbase”,

      I hope they really walked away with
      1. Bikini Briefs not spanx
      2. Sexy smiling Lynda Carter Wonder Woman, not looks-like-chewing-on-rocks angry Wonder Woman

      • websnap on May 13, 2011 11:47 am

        Wonder Woman is not “sexy smiling”, at least not often. That may be your view, but not her representation in the DCU. She’s a warrior, first and foremost. Women can be that, AND attractive too…

        • Damascus on May 23, 2011 5:39 am

          Yes but every picture I’ve seen of the beautiful Adrianne Palicki as Wonder Woman, she had a stern running face on and looks pretty ugly. I can handle stern, but not like she just smelled some really horrible farts.

    7. Rob on May 13, 2011 7:59 am

      Way to go Internet Haters, now we’ll never know. And based on the slow-motion running scene above, I think maybe I wanted to know :(

    8. eric on May 13, 2011 8:06 am

      Ummmmm thank god reason has prevailed. Anyone can look at the pictures that were released and look at the comic book and realize that the quality was not there. It was gonna be crap. If this wants to be done it needs to be done in the same vein as Xena was on TV. Now that was good storytelling and could still be done using the mythology of the comic book. Come on people, you dont have to fix something that is not broke. Your script is right there in the comic book. Executives who dont have a touch for comic books.

    9. ClubberLang6 on May 13, 2011 1:53 pm

      According to yahoo news “The ongoing agita over the design of the title character’s costume — which producers attempted to quell by announcing Wonder Woman would actually alternate three different looks — probably didn’t help either.”

    10. TaZ on May 13, 2011 3:06 pm

      I can’t believe that I’m saying this for the first time but: “Thank you web-nerds.” Everything I saw about it was about as attractive as a zit on the nose of a prom date. (Unless the prom date’s really stacked…then who sees a nose?)

    11. Belmont on May 13, 2011 7:25 pm

      I’d be willing to say that with the end of Smallville maybe the CW would pick this show up. Who knows?

    12. Luis Dantas on May 13, 2011 9:16 pm

      That costume shows _way_ too much skin for WW to be taken seriously.

      Running instead of flying isn’t really a problem. George Perez’ WW was as close to a true success as the character ever had, and she didn’t fly either.

      But the costume is bad enough in comics. In real life it fails completely, I’m afraid. Something that covers the elbows and does not invite one to bet on how long the chest will stay covered is an absolute need.

      Unless, of course, the intent is to make a satire.

    13. HunterDan on May 14, 2011 2:22 am

      Make Birds of Prey Season 2!

    14. Rocket Rooster on May 14, 2011 4:19 am

      “Running instead of flying isn’t really a problem. George Perez’ WW was as close to a true success as the character ever had, and she didn’t fly either.”

      IIRC, it was during the Perez run (Post-Crisis) where she actually did begin to fly instead of “glide on wind currents” like during Pre-Crisis.

    15. Leroy Grey on May 14, 2011 10:54 pm

      count me among the relieved. But I think they could have gotten past Costumegate, and the corporation setting and even the presumptive ‘wacky-dramedy’ tone that’s Kelley’s forte. If they could have shown 15 seconds of someone in the Wonder Woman costume believably putting a beatdown on a couple of thugs, they could have sold the show.
      The role’s not about talent or glamor; Wonder Woman needs to be played by someone physically plausible as a warrior. They’ll try again, but I’ll pay attention when they let somebody like Gina Carano or Michelle Rodriguez (or heck, Jillian Michaels) try on the tiara…

      • Ced on May 15, 2011 11:23 am

        I agree, one good action scene teaser could better sell a Wonder Woman show.

    16. Allen on May 15, 2011 12:00 am

      When will they learn, pay comic properties straight. This “reinvention” sounded awful. Adrienne is a good actress and she’ll land on her feet for sure.

    AMAZON AFFILIATE

    Support this site by making a purchase through our Amazon affiliate links

    Reviews
    8.0
    December 5, 2025

    Ultimate Universe: Two Years In #1 Review

    9.0
    December 1, 2025

    The Flash #27 Review

    4.0
    November 30, 2025

    Daredevil and The Punisher: Devil’s Trigger #1 Review

    6.7
    November 30, 2025

    Retro Review: Marvel Comics #1 (October 1939)

    8.7
    November 28, 2025

    Batman/Green Arrow/The Question: Arcadia #1 Review

    Patreon Support
    Sponsor

    ComiXology Home Page

    Follow Us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Twitch
    Major Spoilers Patreon
    • About
      • Major Spoilers Terms of Use
      • Major Spoilers Frequently Asked Questions
      • Major Spoilers Privacy Policy Statement
      • Major Spoilers Podcast Gear
    • Contact
    • Cookie Policy (EU)
    Major Spoilers is copyright 2006-2025 by Major Spoilers Entertainment, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    SAVE & ACCEPT