looking for play by post group.

[Navarre]

Mine is better.

Nobody likes a braggart. 

[sab39]

Yeah, well my combat grid is better.

[Navarre]

I can instantly kill any player character just by willing it.

Neaner-Neaner! DM for the Win!   

[sab39]

I can bend or break any rule I need to for you to have the character you want. Heck, we have a chaotic good gnome monk! *grins*

Neutral good, thagyouberrybuch. Although I do seem to be stretching the definition of neutral a little bit...

[Navarre]

I can bend or break any rule I need to for you to have the character you want. Heck, we have a chaotic good gnome monk! *grins*

Neutral good, thagyouberrybuch. Although I do seem to be stretching the definition of neutral a little bit...

My mistake ... maybe.

[madmanmax]

it's irritating when people treat alignments in one way. in a dragonlance campaign I've been playing a paladin. His zeal is near limitless and he is willing to die for his cause. this zeal wouldn't be odd except the gods have just returned. he has claimed to have spoken with the gods before their return which makes his lawful good closer to lawful crazy. in a similar fashion, Trevalcor will not be nice good, he will be good overall, with a belief that ends justify means.

[Navarre]

I am not too tight with alignments. I believe it is impossible to pigeonhole a person's every action into an alignment category.

It can, at best, illustrate a trend and provide general guidelines.