<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Frontiersman Site Launches, Nod to Fox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/</link>
	<description>We know you love comics. We do, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:47:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watchmen Movie Viral Marketing-New Frontiersman</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/#comment-99684</link>
		<dc:creator>Watchmen Movie Viral Marketing-New Frontiersman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=9755#comment-99684</guid>
		<description>[...] at Major Spoilers, Stephen Schleicher wonders if the ink blot in the image is the head of a fox and if that might be a jab at 20th Century Fox by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Major Spoilers, Stephen Schleicher wonders if the ink blot in the image is the head of a fox and if that might be a jab at 20th Century Fox by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARCeatsWORLD &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [13/01/09]</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/#comment-96400</link>
		<dc:creator>MARCeatsWORLD &#187; Blog Archive &#187; [13/01/09]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=9755#comment-96400</guid>
		<description>[...] for a site with no content) and is being talked about all across the social web. We have seen conspiracy theorists debate whether the inkblot image is a dig at 20th Century Fox (this is of course not true) ahead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a site with no content) and is being talked about all across the social web. We have seen conspiracy theorists debate whether the inkblot image is a dig at 20th Century Fox (this is of course not true) ahead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/#comment-96128</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=9755#comment-96128</guid>
		<description>a fox? really? it looks like a hot girl holding a platter of burgers to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a fox? really? it looks like a hot girl holding a platter of burgers to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athena Guides : Comics &#187; Archive &#187; Watchmen Movie Viral Marketing-New Frontiersman</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/#comment-95457</link>
		<dc:creator>Athena Guides : Comics &#187; Archive &#187; Watchmen Movie Viral Marketing-New Frontiersman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=9755#comment-95457</guid>
		<description>[...] at Major Spoilers, Stephen Schleicher wonders if the ink blot in the image is the head of a fox and if that might be a jab at 20th Century Fox by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Major Spoilers, Stephen Schleicher wonders if the ink blot in the image is the head of a fox and if that might be a jab at 20th Century Fox by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randallw</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/#comment-95411</link>
		<dc:creator>Randallw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=9755#comment-95411</guid>
		<description>Well the whole point of the blot test is to see what you are pre-occupied with so it&#039;s not so much a case of what the people who made it have in mind but what you do.

That said of course they probably didn&#039;t just blot ink but made up an image, so maybe after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the whole point of the blot test is to see what you are pre-occupied with so it&#8217;s not so much a case of what the people who made it have in mind but what you do.</p>
<p>That said of course they probably didn&#8217;t just blot ink but made up an image, so maybe after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/9755.htm/#comment-95407</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=9755#comment-95407</guid>
		<description>Looks like a fox to me, but I&#039;m not sure what the point would be, or that the team who created the viral website would be clever enough to make that joke.

Plus, I doubt WB wants to incur the wrath of Fox anymore than they already have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a fox to me, but I&#8217;m not sure what the point would be, or that the team who created the viral website would be clever enough to make that joke.</p>
<p>Plus, I doubt WB wants to incur the wrath of Fox anymore than they already have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
