<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Wolverine #68</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/</link>
	<description>We know you love comics. We do, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:39:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/#comment-82650</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6433#comment-82650</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Actually i’m really glad you reviewed it, yes Dan I could tell it wasn’t his normal pick but that was the point.

I’ve collected Wolverine in the past, and have been tempted to pick up this arc, seeing as how it’s a couple issues in I was thinking of waiting for the Trade to be release.

Matthew stated very clearly that this wasn’t something he would normally enjoy, that tells me that his 2.5 is probably a 3 to 3.5 for a fan of Wolverine.

I’m just happy to see the review.&lt;/i&gt;

I freely admit that I don&#039;t &quot;get&quot; Wolverine.  This wasn&#039;t a &lt;b&gt;bad&lt;/b&gt; issue by any means, but it certainly wasn&#039;t a world-changing look at the underlying paradigms of comics, nor was it even the best Wolverine story I&#039;ve ever read.  It is what it is: a well-done Very Special Issue by star creators, the comics equivalent of sweeps week, and a large portion of the story felt very familiar.  

Had friends and coworkers not hyped this to me as the most important Wolverine story in recent memory, maybe I&#039;d feel differently, but there you go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Actually i’m really glad you reviewed it, yes Dan I could tell it wasn’t his normal pick but that was the point.</p>
<p>I’ve collected Wolverine in the past, and have been tempted to pick up this arc, seeing as how it’s a couple issues in I was thinking of waiting for the Trade to be release.</p>
<p>Matthew stated very clearly that this wasn’t something he would normally enjoy, that tells me that his 2.5 is probably a 3 to 3.5 for a fan of Wolverine.</p>
<p>I’m just happy to see the review.</i></p>
<p>I freely admit that I don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; Wolverine.  This wasn&#8217;t a <b>bad</b> issue by any means, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t a world-changing look at the underlying paradigms of comics, nor was it even the best Wolverine story I&#8217;ve ever read.  It is what it is: a well-done Very Special Issue by star creators, the comics equivalent of sweeps week, and a large portion of the story felt very familiar.  </p>
<p>Had friends and coworkers not hyped this to me as the most important Wolverine story in recent memory, maybe I&#8217;d feel differently, but there you go&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/#comment-82648</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6433#comment-82648</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wow. That has to be the worst review I’ve ever seen. I couldn’t even classify it as a review. More like a sarcastic recap in a whiny voice. 

Reviewing a book that’s in the middle of a story arc, when you haven’t read the first 2 issues just illustrates you didn’t give a crap to begin with.

Go back to reviewing stuff you ‘love’, nobody got anything out of that. &lt;/i&gt;

Thanks for your feedback, Dan.  Since you&#039;re new here, let me spell out a couple of things quickly.  There is generally nothing personal about my reviews.  I explained my biases up front, so caveat emptor.  Second, my writing style is sarcastic, even when reviewing something I love.  Third, and most important, I speak only for me, you speak only for you.  Stating that &quot;nobody&quot; got anything out of that is disengenuous, adversarial, and ultimately serves only your need for the quick burn...

Feel free to stick around and see what else pops up this week...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Wow. That has to be the worst review I’ve ever seen. I couldn’t even classify it as a review. More like a sarcastic recap in a whiny voice. </p>
<p>Reviewing a book that’s in the middle of a story arc, when you haven’t read the first 2 issues just illustrates you didn’t give a crap to begin with.</p>
<p>Go back to reviewing stuff you ‘love’, nobody got anything out of that. </i></p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback, Dan.  Since you&#8217;re new here, let me spell out a couple of things quickly.  There is generally nothing personal about my reviews.  I explained my biases up front, so caveat emptor.  Second, my writing style is sarcastic, even when reviewing something I love.  Third, and most important, I speak only for me, you speak only for you.  Stating that &#8220;nobody&#8221; got anything out of that is disengenuous, adversarial, and ultimately serves only your need for the quick burn&#8230;</p>
<p>Feel free to stick around and see what else pops up this week&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricco</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/#comment-82628</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6433#comment-82628</guid>
		<description>I have not read a single issue I can guess that the big plot twist is that a mind controlled Wolverine killed all the heores thinking they were vilains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not read a single issue I can guess that the big plot twist is that a mind controlled Wolverine killed all the heores thinking they were vilains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/#comment-82619</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6433#comment-82619</guid>
		<description>Actually i&#039;m really glad you reviewed it, yes Dan I could tell it wasn&#039;t his normal pick but that was the point.

I&#039;ve collected Wolverine in the past, and have been tempted to pick up this arc, seeing as how it&#039;s a couple issues in I was thinking of waiting for the Trade to be release.

Matthew stated very clearly that this wasn&#039;t something he would normally enjoy, that tells me that his 2.5 is probably a 3 to 3.5 for a fan of Wolverine.

I&#039;m just happy to see the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually i&#8217;m really glad you reviewed it, yes Dan I could tell it wasn&#8217;t his normal pick but that was the point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve collected Wolverine in the past, and have been tempted to pick up this arc, seeing as how it&#8217;s a couple issues in I was thinking of waiting for the Trade to be release.</p>
<p>Matthew stated very clearly that this wasn&#8217;t something he would normally enjoy, that tells me that his 2.5 is probably a 3 to 3.5 for a fan of Wolverine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just happy to see the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanLikesBeer</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/#comment-82604</link>
		<dc:creator>DanLikesBeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6433#comment-82604</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That has to be the worst review I&#039;ve ever seen.  I couldn&#039;t even classify it as a review.  More like a sarcastic recap in a whiny voice.  

Reviewing a book that&#039;s in the middle of a story arc, when you haven&#039;t read the first 2 issues just illustrates you didn&#039;t give a crap to begin with.

Go back to reviewing stuff you &#039;love&#039;, nobody got anything out of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That has to be the worst review I&#8217;ve ever seen.  I couldn&#8217;t even classify it as a review.  More like a sarcastic recap in a whiny voice.  </p>
<p>Reviewing a book that&#8217;s in the middle of a story arc, when you haven&#8217;t read the first 2 issues just illustrates you didn&#8217;t give a crap to begin with.</p>
<p>Go back to reviewing stuff you &#8216;love&#8217;, nobody got anything out of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximus Rift</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6433.htm/#comment-82598</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximus Rift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6433#comment-82598</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve had it with dystopian futures.  I&#039;ve had it with the whole &quot;villains win&quot; stories.  I&#039;m not opposed to having some, but it seems to me like it&#039;s the new status-quo of the Big 2. I&#039;m actually expecting Image to announce how their universe is going down the toilet.

Can I please have a possitive superhero story that isn&#039;t meant for children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve had it with dystopian futures.  I&#8217;ve had it with the whole &#8220;villains win&#8221; stories.  I&#8217;m not opposed to having some, but it seems to me like it&#8217;s the new status-quo of the Big 2. I&#8217;m actually expecting Image to announce how their universe is going down the toilet.</p>
<p>Can I please have a possitive superhero story that isn&#8217;t meant for children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
