<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSP#39: The Invincible Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/</link>
	<description>We know you love comics. We do, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:55:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eons_past</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/#comment-82227</link>
		<dc:creator>Eons_past</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6349#comment-82227</guid>
		<description>I kinda liked Casino Royale just because I think they finally realized that so many gadgets were making the movies to silly. More action, less tech is what made that movie great.  Here&#039;s hoping quantum of solace follows suit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda liked Casino Royale just because I think they finally realized that so many gadgets were making the movies to silly. More action, less tech is what made that movie great.  Here&#8217;s hoping quantum of solace follows suit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/#comment-82226</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6349#comment-82226</guid>
		<description>Marty Feldman also makes a good Bond in the original version of &quot;Casino Royale.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty Feldman also makes a good Bond in the original version of &#8220;Casino Royale.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/#comment-82196</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6349#comment-82196</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll check it out, especially since it has one of the better titles in the series</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll check it out, especially since it has one of the better titles in the series</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/#comment-82180</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6349#comment-82180</guid>
		<description>Stephen is right, George Lazenby is my favorite Bond with&quot;On Her Majesty&#039;s Secret Service&quot; the best Bond movie.  If you have never seen it, rent it.  It is interesting in just how different it is compared with all the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen is right, George Lazenby is my favorite Bond with&#8221;On Her Majesty&#8217;s Secret Service&#8221; the best Bond movie.  If you have never seen it, rent it.  It is interesting in just how different it is compared with all the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/6349.htm/#comment-82092</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=6349#comment-82092</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny you guys were talking about Spider-Man 4 villains, b/c we were just talking about it on my CouchCasters podcast yesterday night (you beat me to the punch, though. I&#039;m a lazy editor.) We felt that since Fox was looking to revamp Daredevil as well, that the Spider-Man 4 villain should be: Michael Clarke Duncan as the Kingpin. Then he could put together a bunch of thugs (Rhino, Electro, Vulture, Scorpion, whoever), people who don&#039;t need much backstory to be the sinister six and fight spidey. Check out our last episode, which rants at length about Spider-Man, and the new one I&#039;ll be posting soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny you guys were talking about Spider-Man 4 villains, b/c we were just talking about it on my CouchCasters podcast yesterday night (you beat me to the punch, though. I&#8217;m a lazy editor.) We felt that since Fox was looking to revamp Daredevil as well, that the Spider-Man 4 villain should be: Michael Clarke Duncan as the Kingpin. Then he could put together a bunch of thugs (Rhino, Electro, Vulture, Scorpion, whoever), people who don&#8217;t need much backstory to be the sinister six and fight spidey. Check out our last episode, which rants at length about Spider-Man, and the new one I&#8217;ll be posting soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
