<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Incredible Hulk a Flop?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/</link>
	<description>We know you love comics. We do, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:47:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76305</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76305</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the often made statement (I think Roger Ebert made it in a review) that the Hulk isn&#039;t as popular or as marketable as other Marvel characters.  I strongly believe that up until the X-Men movie (or possibly even the Spiderman movie) the Hulk TV show was Marvel&#039;s best media success.  Not only was it on one of the big three channels, I think it ran for about 5 years.  That&#039;s probably the most succesful super hero TV show ever (Smallvile might have run for longer, but I don&#039;t believe it is anywhere near as popular).

I think one thing that hurt the Hulk is that critics love Ang Lee and I think kind of resented his movie getting a seemingly reebooted treatment.  I think the resentment some what hurt the reviews, thus leading to people not seeing the movie.  I also think Iron Man&#039;s success kind of hurt the Hulk in the review department.  I think critics (who are movie people) were wary of giving great reviews to two back to back released super hero movies presented in a very comic bookish shared universe.  I think the shared universe thing will play out well in the long run, but I think it will get some critic snobbery in the meantime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the often made statement (I think Roger Ebert made it in a review) that the Hulk isn&#8217;t as popular or as marketable as other Marvel characters.  I strongly believe that up until the X-Men movie (or possibly even the Spiderman movie) the Hulk TV show was Marvel&#8217;s best media success.  Not only was it on one of the big three channels, I think it ran for about 5 years.  That&#8217;s probably the most succesful super hero TV show ever (Smallvile might have run for longer, but I don&#8217;t believe it is anywhere near as popular).</p>
<p>I think one thing that hurt the Hulk is that critics love Ang Lee and I think kind of resented his movie getting a seemingly reebooted treatment.  I think the resentment some what hurt the reviews, thus leading to people not seeing the movie.  I also think Iron Man&#8217;s success kind of hurt the Hulk in the review department.  I think critics (who are movie people) were wary of giving great reviews to two back to back released super hero movies presented in a very comic bookish shared universe.  I think the shared universe thing will play out well in the long run, but I think it will get some critic snobbery in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76181</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76181</guid>
		<description>Incredible Hulk s not a flop per se (Speed Racer is). International Box Office will be ok, the movie is not out in France (Jerry Lewis is a 1960 joke, I&#039;m sure my Granpa knew who he was, I never saw him on TV or in the paper) and Japan yet. Dont expect more than 10 millions in France, Hulk is not that popular over here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible Hulk s not a flop per se (Speed Racer is). International Box Office will be ok, the movie is not out in France (Jerry Lewis is a 1960 joke, I&#8217;m sure my Granpa knew who he was, I never saw him on TV or in the paper) and Japan yet. Dont expect more than 10 millions in France, Hulk is not that popular over here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James G</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76151</link>
		<dc:creator>James G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76151</guid>
		<description>One thing that most people don&#039;t realize though, is that often, in order to fund a movie, production companies will sell the rights to the distribution in foreign companies.  In order to fund Golden Compass, New Line sold all the rights to distribute the film outside of the States, which is also selling the right to make a profit from foreign film sales.  Essentially they were banking that the movie would do well domestically.  Unfortunately for them, it did horribly domestically and fantastically in the foreign market.  They saw little or nothing from that foreign success, and therefore the movie is a complete flaw despite on the surface making back its money.

Let me be clear: I don&#039;t know what distribution rights if any were sold on Incredible Hulk, but be careful about blindly adding in the foreign box office when you are trying to add to the box office value to the studio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that most people don&#8217;t realize though, is that often, in order to fund a movie, production companies will sell the rights to the distribution in foreign companies.  In order to fund Golden Compass, New Line sold all the rights to distribute the film outside of the States, which is also selling the right to make a profit from foreign film sales.  Essentially they were banking that the movie would do well domestically.  Unfortunately for them, it did horribly domestically and fantastically in the foreign market.  They saw little or nothing from that foreign success, and therefore the movie is a complete flaw despite on the surface making back its money.</p>
<p>Let me be clear: I don&#8217;t know what distribution rights if any were sold on Incredible Hulk, but be careful about blindly adding in the foreign box office when you are trying to add to the box office value to the studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gin</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76100</link>
		<dc:creator>Gin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76100</guid>
		<description>@Morpheus

I too am waiting for video! ;)  Financially and time-wise I can&#039;t afford to see that and all the other films I want to see this summer- but if it came out in those boring winter months I know I would have gone to the theater then.

The idea I was attempting to suggest was that casual movie-going audiences are less inclined to take a chance on something when there are fewer choices.  If it&#039;s enjoyable (as Iron Man certainly was), word spreads to audiences that probably weren&#039;t planning on seeing it before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Morpheus</p>
<p>I too am waiting for video! ;)  Financially and time-wise I can&#8217;t afford to see that and all the other films I want to see this summer- but if it came out in those boring winter months I know I would have gone to the theater then.</p>
<p>The idea I was attempting to suggest was that casual movie-going audiences are less inclined to take a chance on something when there are fewer choices.  If it&#8217;s enjoyable (as Iron Man certainly was), word spreads to audiences that probably weren&#8217;t planning on seeing it before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark I.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76099</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76099</guid>
		<description>On an unrelated note, JJ Abrams is pissed because his new Star Trek movie got pushed to summer 09.  He feels it would have cleaned house in the original Christmas 08 slot but Paramount doesn&#039;t have a summer blockbuster, so they moved it where he&#039;s afraid it will get lost in the schlock shuffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On an unrelated note, JJ Abrams is pissed because his new Star Trek movie got pushed to summer 09.  He feels it would have cleaned house in the original Christmas 08 slot but Paramount doesn&#8217;t have a summer blockbuster, so they moved it where he&#8217;s afraid it will get lost in the schlock shuffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morpheus11</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76080</link>
		<dc:creator>Morpheus11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76080</guid>
		<description>Since it looks like all the people that have commented have seen the new Hulk movie I will be the person that explains why I haven&#039;t seen the new movie.  It is the same reason I didn&#039;t see Ang Lee&#039;s vesion until it was out on a TV movie channel and it was on at 2 am and I was trying to go to sleep.

Hulk&#039;s character is a complicated character for anyone that hasn&#039;t followed the comic books and even for some people that have.  He isn&#039;t the hero that everyone can get behind, he isn&#039;t a person that people can relate to, and the Hulk isn&#039;t the &quot;brightest crayon in the box&quot;.  

I am not saying that the new Hulk movie isn&#039;t good.  I am just saying that the following for the Hulk is smaller than most other comic book characters.  

@Gin, I am not sure if this movie would have come out between Jan-May if it would have made that much difference.  It still wouldn&#039;t have made the money that Iron-man, Spider-man, or X-men made.

IMHO, Marvel made this movie b/c it was easier (safer) to remake Hulk than to come up with something all new.  And the hype from the movie will help the studio in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it looks like all the people that have commented have seen the new Hulk movie I will be the person that explains why I haven&#8217;t seen the new movie.  It is the same reason I didn&#8217;t see Ang Lee&#8217;s vesion until it was out on a TV movie channel and it was on at 2 am and I was trying to go to sleep.</p>
<p>Hulk&#8217;s character is a complicated character for anyone that hasn&#8217;t followed the comic books and even for some people that have.  He isn&#8217;t the hero that everyone can get behind, he isn&#8217;t a person that people can relate to, and the Hulk isn&#8217;t the &#8220;brightest crayon in the box&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I am not saying that the new Hulk movie isn&#8217;t good.  I am just saying that the following for the Hulk is smaller than most other comic book characters.  </p>
<p>@Gin, I am not sure if this movie would have come out between Jan-May if it would have made that much difference.  It still wouldn&#8217;t have made the money that Iron-man, Spider-man, or X-men made.</p>
<p>IMHO, Marvel made this movie b/c it was easier (safer) to remake Hulk than to come up with something all new.  And the hype from the movie will help the studio in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh P.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76079</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76079</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how when releasing a film completely affects its domestic box office pull.

Had Incredible Hulk been released in the Fall or earlier in the Spring it would&#039;nt have anything to compete with.  Look at Ghost Rider.  Quality aside, it made a killing in the domestic box office.  Why?  Because it was released in the Winter/Spring.  Same thing with 300.

If you try to compete with all the other blockbusters released weekly in June-August, you&#039;re not going to make as much money.  Only people like me are going to go to the movies every week and see something new.  I would guess that the average movie goer sees less than one movie a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how when releasing a film completely affects its domestic box office pull.</p>
<p>Had Incredible Hulk been released in the Fall or earlier in the Spring it would&#8217;nt have anything to compete with.  Look at Ghost Rider.  Quality aside, it made a killing in the domestic box office.  Why?  Because it was released in the Winter/Spring.  Same thing with 300.</p>
<p>If you try to compete with all the other blockbusters released weekly in June-August, you&#8217;re not going to make as much money.  Only people like me are going to go to the movies every week and see something new.  I would guess that the average movie goer sees less than one movie a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gin</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76065</link>
		<dc:creator>Gin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76065</guid>
		<description>I should edit my statement- when I say &quot;spring&quot; I actually mean Jan-May... that time where the snow is slushy and the sky is all boring and I want to see a movie but nothing interests me.  Blaaaaah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should edit my statement- when I say &#8220;spring&#8221; I actually mean Jan-May&#8230; that time where the snow is slushy and the sky is all boring and I want to see a movie but nothing interests me.  Blaaaaah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gin</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76064</link>
		<dc:creator>Gin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76064</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree that Ang Lee is as big a factor in this.  I have many friends who are pumped about the Hulk simply because Edward Norton is in it.

There are way too many films that people have been waiting a long time for competing with The Incredible Hulk right now.

Iron Man did it right- it came in at the beginning of the sumer movie deluge.  I question whether it would have worked out as well if it came in in the midst of all these other films.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, the movie is wonderful, but spring is terribly dry for exciting films.  It probably drew in a bunch of people who just casually wanted to see a fun film in addition to the people who were super excited about it.

The spring is a pretty dead time for interesting films (I can only think of horror films or terribly-written &quot;comedies&quot; that come out then)- it makes me wonder, would a film series have more success if the first film debuts in the spring and following films make the summer list?

Gah, but Elektra did that... but was it any good?  I really disliked Daredevil so I didn&#039;t even bother.

@ Mark I.
&quot;I have similar feelings about a solo Wonder Woman movie…it would positively bomb. But if you made her origin appearance the center of the first Justice League movie, now you’re cooking with fi-yah.&quot;

Very, very good point!  I whole-heartedly agree with this statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree that Ang Lee is as big a factor in this.  I have many friends who are pumped about the Hulk simply because Edward Norton is in it.</p>
<p>There are way too many films that people have been waiting a long time for competing with The Incredible Hulk right now.</p>
<p>Iron Man did it right- it came in at the beginning of the sumer movie deluge.  I question whether it would have worked out as well if it came in in the midst of all these other films.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, the movie is wonderful, but spring is terribly dry for exciting films.  It probably drew in a bunch of people who just casually wanted to see a fun film in addition to the people who were super excited about it.</p>
<p>The spring is a pretty dead time for interesting films (I can only think of horror films or terribly-written &#8220;comedies&#8221; that come out then)- it makes me wonder, would a film series have more success if the first film debuts in the spring and following films make the summer list?</p>
<p>Gah, but Elektra did that&#8230; but was it any good?  I really disliked Daredevil so I didn&#8217;t even bother.</p>
<p>@ Mark I.<br />
&#8220;I have similar feelings about a solo Wonder Woman movie…it would positively bomb. But if you made her origin appearance the center of the first Justice League movie, now you’re cooking with fi-yah.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very, very good point!  I whole-heartedly agree with this statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76063</link>
		<dc:creator>hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76063</guid>
		<description>i think people are just afraid because of the first one. while this new one is a very good movie, it was not a good idea to make it.

just do captain america and avenger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think people are just afraid because of the first one. while this new one is a very good movie, it was not a good idea to make it.</p>
<p>just do captain america and avenger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doubledumbassonyou &#124;&#124; a colorful metaphor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Much Delayed Link Dump</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76061</link>
		<dc:creator>doubledumbassonyou &#124;&#124; a colorful metaphor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Much Delayed Link Dump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76061</guid>
		<description>[...] over at Major Spoilers mulls over the prospect that The Incredible Hulk could in fact could be considered a flop. [Major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at Major Spoilers mulls over the prospect that The Incredible Hulk could in fact could be considered a flop. [Major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark I.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4495.htm/#comment-76059</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4495#comment-76059</guid>
		<description>It was just to soon to reboot the franchise and expect people to go in with Ang Lee&#039;s version off their pallets.  Between merchandising and DVD it will more than make up for the budget, and I honestly think that the point was to get a fresh, in-universe take on the character out there for the Avengers movie.  Between Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Ant-Man, Spider-Man, Fantastic Four, X-Men, Punisher, Daredevil, and the Avengers in general, Marvel&#039;s got a lot of characters on or scheduled to be on the big screen in this era.  

The Hulk storyline gets odd and convoluted if you evolve the character as in the comics and gets boring fast if you make another &quot;Banner on the run from Ross&quot; film.  Maybe a one-and-done with an Avengers appearance is the way to go.  (I have similar feelings about asolo Wonder Woman movie...it would positively bomb.  But if you made her origin appearance the center of the first Justice League movie, now you&#039;re cooking with fi-yah.)

My biggest gripe is that if the Fantastic 4 ever get integrated into the Marvel movie universe, how ridiculous would Chiklis-in-Thing-suit vs. CGI Hulk look?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just to soon to reboot the franchise and expect people to go in with Ang Lee&#8217;s version off their pallets.  Between merchandising and DVD it will more than make up for the budget, and I honestly think that the point was to get a fresh, in-universe take on the character out there for the Avengers movie.  Between Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Ant-Man, Spider-Man, Fantastic Four, X-Men, Punisher, Daredevil, and the Avengers in general, Marvel&#8217;s got a lot of characters on or scheduled to be on the big screen in this era.  </p>
<p>The Hulk storyline gets odd and convoluted if you evolve the character as in the comics and gets boring fast if you make another &#8220;Banner on the run from Ross&#8221; film.  Maybe a one-and-done with an Avengers appearance is the way to go.  (I have similar feelings about asolo Wonder Woman movie&#8230;it would positively bomb.  But if you made her origin appearance the center of the first Justice League movie, now you&#8217;re cooking with fi-yah.)</p>
<p>My biggest gripe is that if the Fantastic 4 ever get integrated into the Marvel movie universe, how ridiculous would Chiklis-in-Thing-suit vs. CGI Hulk look?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
