http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4396.htm/ We know you love comics. We do, too. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:47:12 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4396.htm/#comment-75185 Young Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:11:43 +0000 http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4396#comment-75185 Looking at the first three covers, I think DC blew an opportunity to just continue expanding on the image over the whole 52 weeks, so that you would have this really long montage of what took place over the year, rather than just building 3 issue wide images...it would have been something different and unique. Looking at the first three covers, I think DC blew an opportunity to just continue expanding on the image over the whole 52 weeks, so that you would have this really long montage of what took place over the year, rather than just building 3 issue wide images…it would have been something different and unique.

]]> http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4396.htm/#comment-75178 E. Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:41:06 +0000 http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4396#comment-75178 Although drawn out (and kinda boring), it is well drawn and is way better than Countdown as far as weeklies go. And isn't everyone glad that they don't have to worry about this story failing to fit into continuity of CRISIS 4: CRISIS FOR YER ARSE when it drops next year? Although drawn out (and kinda boring), it is well drawn and is way better than Countdown as far as weeklies go. And isn’t everyone glad that they don’t have to worry about this story failing to fit into continuity of CRISIS 4: CRISIS FOR YER ARSE when it drops next year?

]]>