<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Robin #174</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4112.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4112.htm/</link>
	<description>We Know You Love Comics.  We Do Too.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ykw</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4112.htm/#comment-68289</link>
		<dc:creator>ykw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4112#comment-68289</guid>
		<description>"Dixon’s handling of this particular issue is well done, even if everything seems forced into 22-pages."

That's just 'cos we've all grown used to what comics sound like in the Age of Decompression. Stories used to be fully fleshed out in done-in-one-(or-two)-issue(s) rather than hyper-extended arcs, and characterization/soap-opera elements were more holistically integrated with the main storyline. Ever since Marv Wolfman and Chris Claremont showed that, yes, you =could= decouple the two and that you =could= tell stories that built up organically over the course of several months or even years, the industry seems to have believed that you =had= to construct stories in that manner. 

Dixon comes from a slightly older school than that. Thank goodness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dixon’s handling of this particular issue is well done, even if everything seems forced into 22-pages.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just &#8216;cos we&#8217;ve all grown used to what comics sound like in the Age of Decompression. Stories used to be fully fleshed out in done-in-one-(or-two)-issue(s) rather than hyper-extended arcs, and characterization/soap-opera elements were more holistically integrated with the main storyline. Ever since Marv Wolfman and Chris Claremont showed that, yes, you =could= decouple the two and that you =could= tell stories that built up organically over the course of several months or even years, the industry seems to have believed that you =had= to construct stories in that manner. </p>
<p>Dixon comes from a slightly older school than that. Thank goodness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacin B.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/4112.htm/#comment-67978</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=4112#comment-67978</guid>
		<description>I'm alright with Stephanie being back.

I think that the explanation given by Dixon for Lesley Thompkins' 'disappearing' her is solid -- after what had just happened to her at the hands of Black Mask, having her out of the picture for a good long while (over a year, per One Year Later) to give her time to heal from the physical and mental scars that must've left was a good idea.

And, it's exactly what Thompkins &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; have done, and explains away the otherwise unbelievable "I'm a heartless b**** who let Stephanie die just to teach you a lesson, Brcue" characterization at the end of War Games ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m alright with Stephanie being back.</p>
<p>I think that the explanation given by Dixon for Lesley Thompkins&#8217; &#8216;disappearing&#8217; her is solid &#8212; after what had just happened to her at the hands of Black Mask, having her out of the picture for a good long while (over a year, per One Year Later) to give her time to heal from the physical and mental scars that must&#8217;ve left was a good idea.</p>
<p>And, it&#8217;s exactly what Thompkins <i>would</i> have done, and explains away the otherwise unbelievable &#8220;I&#8217;m a heartless b**** who let Stephanie die just to teach you a lesson, Brcue&#8221; characterization at the end of War Games &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
