<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spirit Gets Release Date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/</link>
	<description>We Know You Love Comics.  We Do Too.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Fenreer</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36522</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Fenreer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36522</guid>
		<description>Elektra was January
Daredevil was freakin' Valentine's Day, and probably brought many relationships to an abrupt end.
Constantine was a February release
Ghost Rider was February

Er... heh. Brent must be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elektra was January<br />
Daredevil was freakin&#8217; Valentine&#8217;s Day, and probably brought many relationships to an abrupt end.<br />
Constantine was a February release<br />
Ghost Rider was February</p>
<p>Er&#8230; heh. Brent must be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36512</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 21:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36512</guid>
		<description>The poster was more just something for Frank Miller to show along with his proposals for the film wasn't it?

I have high hopes for this film. Roll on January 2009!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poster was more just something for Frank Miller to show along with his proposals for the film wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I have high hopes for this film. Roll on January 2009!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james deckert</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36494</link>
		<dc:creator>james deckert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36494</guid>
		<description>The poster certainly looks more like "Sin City: The Sequel" than Eisner's Spirit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poster certainly looks more like &#8220;Sin City: The Sequel&#8221; than Eisner&#8217;s Spirit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent F.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36485</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36485</guid>
		<description>The first two months of the year are the dumping grounds for movies that have horrible test screenings or that the studios have absolutely no confidence in.

The January date should indicate to you the level of confidence Frank Miller's The Spirit has garnered from the studios and producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first two months of the year are the dumping grounds for movies that have horrible test screenings or that the studios have absolutely no confidence in.</p>
<p>The January date should indicate to you the level of confidence Frank Miller&#8217;s The Spirit has garnered from the studios and producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark I.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36479</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/2249.htm/#comment-36479</guid>
		<description>I'm a little torn.  I get the feeling that Miller's going to heavily cribbing the art direction and cinematography of SIN CITY, which was original enough done once...done twice might be pushing it, even with superior source material.  Also, I'd be a lot happier to see "Will Eisner's Spirit" if the poster actually had a picture of Will Eisner's Spirit on it.  All I see is "Frank Miller's Spirit" at the moment.

Still, I can't argue with the source material, nor with Eva Mendes and Scarlet Johannsen femme-fatale-in' it up...I mean, even if the film is an overall stinker, those two will at least provide a few bucks worth of eye candy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little torn.  I get the feeling that Miller&#8217;s going to heavily cribbing the art direction and cinematography of SIN CITY, which was original enough done once&#8230;done twice might be pushing it, even with superior source material.  Also, I&#8217;d be a lot happier to see &#8220;Will Eisner&#8217;s Spirit&#8221; if the poster actually had a picture of Will Eisner&#8217;s Spirit on it.  All I see is &#8220;Frank Miller&#8217;s Spirit&#8221; at the moment.</p>
<p>Still, I can&#8217;t argue with the source material, nor with Eva Mendes and Scarlet Johannsen femme-fatale-in&#8217; it up&#8230;I mean, even if the film is an overall stinker, those two will at least provide a few bucks worth of eye candy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
