<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolverine indeed headed back to theaters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/</link>
	<description>We know you love comics. We do, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ~wyntermute~</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/#comment-159499</link>
		<dc:creator>~wyntermute~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=21490#comment-159499</guid>
		<description>I am of the opinion that this movie would be better with more ninjas &amp; less Wolvie.   Can we maybe substitute Psylocke?  She would still kinda work with the ninja-theme.  Otherwise, I say scrap it all and focus on another mutant.  :)  I didn&#039;t go to see &quot;Origins&quot; because I&#039;ve had enough Wolvie, so I&#039;ll probably take a pass on this too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am of the opinion that this movie would be better with more ninjas &amp; less Wolvie.   Can we maybe substitute Psylocke?  She would still kinda work with the ninja-theme.  Otherwise, I say scrap it all and focus on another mutant.  :)  I didn&#8217;t go to see &#8220;Origins&#8221; because I&#8217;ve had enough Wolvie, so I&#8217;ll probably take a pass on this too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/#comment-159354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=21490#comment-159354</guid>
		<description>Watching &quot;Wolverine&quot; was somewhat enjoyable but afterwards I couldn&#039;t stop thinking about how incredibly absurd and even corny a lot of the movie was. The second one is obviously a ways off, so I&#039;ll probably see it but I hope it&#039;s not just better but A LOT better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching &#8220;Wolverine&#8221; was somewhat enjoyable but afterwards I couldn&#8217;t stop thinking about how incredibly absurd and even corny a lot of the movie was. The second one is obviously a ways off, so I&#8217;ll probably see it but I hope it&#8217;s not just better but A LOT better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindstreet</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/#comment-159339</link>
		<dc:creator>lindstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=21490#comment-159339</guid>
		<description>The first was okay, definitely not as good as it could have been. Hopefully this will be back to the level of quality set by the first two X-men movies. Looking forward to watching it in the theaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first was okay, definitely not as good as it could have been. Hopefully this will be back to the level of quality set by the first two X-men movies. Looking forward to watching it in the theaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermit</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/#comment-159330</link>
		<dc:creator>hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=21490#comment-159330</guid>
		<description>as much as i like the idea of putting the miller/claremont book to the silver screen, i think they nned to let the character go and do something else. heck, there&#039;s hundreds of mutants in the x-men universe, surely they can pick one and make it as interesting as wolverine. he already had 3 movies about him, not counting origin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as much as i like the idea of putting the miller/claremont book to the silver screen, i think they nned to let the character go and do something else. heck, there&#8217;s hundreds of mutants in the x-men universe, surely they can pick one and make it as interesting as wolverine. he already had 3 movies about him, not counting origin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother129</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/21490.htm/#comment-159322</link>
		<dc:creator>Brother129</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=21490#comment-159322</guid>
		<description>Sometimes sequels are better than the original.  As was the case with X-Men 2.  I hope this is true in this regard.  Wolverine left me feeling somewhat empty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes sequels are better than the original.  As was the case with X-Men 2.  I hope this is true in this regard.  Wolverine left me feeling somewhat empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
