<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nexus #99</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/</link>
	<description>We Know You Love Comics.  We Do Too.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-32262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-32262</guid>
		<description>Back when we were kids we could pick up an issues of a comic and work out what was going on, without having to start 200 issues earlier. Give Nexus a chance! it's ace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when we were kids we could pick up an issues of a comic and work out what was going on, without having to start 200 issues earlier. Give Nexus a chance! it&#8217;s ace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baal</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-28104</link>
		<dc:creator>Baal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-28104</guid>
		<description>I read maybe one third of the original Nexus series and I had no problems following what was going on.  Maybe I didn't know all thenames but thanks to the art and writing I knew the important things to the story.  If I win the lottery, screw buying my mom a house.  I'd underwrite Nexus for life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read maybe one third of the original Nexus series and I had no problems following what was going on.  Maybe I didn&#8217;t know all thenames but thanks to the art and writing I knew the important things to the story.  If I win the lottery, screw buying my mom a house.  I&#8217;d underwrite Nexus for life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-28006</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-28006</guid>
		<description>Even a new Madman book was ultimately unable to get me to a comic shop. 
Nexus #99. . .Let me get my checkbook.  My favorite comic of ALL TIME returns.  I think I'll head over to All C's Collectibles and reserve this book.  Now instead of a pull list that can't be seen with a scanning electron microscope, I will have one that can be seen from across a table.  

I think (see opening paragraph of review) the Dude is simply the best penciller ever.  One of the best things about Nexus(as a creator owned title) is that in over 20+ years of intermittent publication, the book has never succumbed to trendy art styles.  It always looks like Steve Rude on Nexus, and nothing else, which, for me, has led to a really consistent fictional world.  During the First series a few guest artists did stints on the books (because Rude isn't an especially fast penciller) but for the most part is has been Baron and Rude's baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even a new Madman book was ultimately unable to get me to a comic shop.<br />
Nexus #99. . .Let me get my checkbook.  My favorite comic of ALL TIME returns.  I think I&#8217;ll head over to All C&#8217;s Collectibles and reserve this book.  Now instead of a pull list that can&#8217;t be seen with a scanning electron microscope, I will have one that can be seen from across a table.  </p>
<p>I think (see opening paragraph of review) the Dude is simply the best penciller ever.  One of the best things about Nexus(as a creator owned title) is that in over 20+ years of intermittent publication, the book has never succumbed to trendy art styles.  It always looks like Steve Rude on Nexus, and nothing else, which, for me, has led to a really consistent fictional world.  During the First series a few guest artists did stints on the books (because Rude isn&#8217;t an especially fast penciller) but for the most part is has been Baron and Rude&#8217;s baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-27996</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-27996</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Reminds you of Kirby? I got more of a Giffen vibe…&lt;/i&gt;

Giffen's action sequences are very reminiscent of Kirby, and an overt Kirby influence can be seen in his early work on Defenders...  So, yes, I agree with you.  :)

&lt;img src="http://image.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/23565426234.45.WHITMAN.GIF"/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Reminds you of Kirby? I got more of a Giffen vibe…</i></p>
<p>Giffen&#8217;s action sequences are very reminiscent of Kirby, and an overt Kirby influence can be seen in his early work on Defenders&#8230;  So, yes, I agree with you.  :)</p>
<p><img src="http://image.milehighcomics.com/istore/images/fullsize/23565426234.45.WHITMAN.GIF"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-27995</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-27995</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Major Spoilers Dictionary&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;“Tom Grice is WRONG, Sir!  &lt;i&gt;WRONG!”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; - Statement of mockery towards Tom Grice (see Appendix) indicating disagreement with his point of view or general intent to bust balls.  Designed to mimic the tone and phrasing of Gene Wilder's performance as Willy Wonka during the climactic scene of Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  Sometimes followed with "You STOLE Fizzy Lifting Drinks!  You bumped into the ceiling, with now has to be WASHED and STERILIZED, so you get NOTHING!  YOU LOSE!  GOOD DAY, SIR!"  Occasional additional retort of "I SAID GOOD DAY!" optional.

&lt;b&gt;Appendix: Tom Grice&lt;/b&gt; - Born 1972, Midwestern comic store manager, known for being outspoken in his opinions and acerbic in his humor.  Known as "The Earth-1 Matthew" and occasionally "Ultra Tommy," has a comic pull list that can be seen from space.  Though often very thoughtful in his opinions, he is nonetheless &lt;strong&gt;WRONG,&lt;/strong&gt; Sir!  &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WRONG!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Major Spoilers Dictionary</b></p>
<p><b>“Tom Grice is WRONG, Sir!  <i>WRONG!”</i></b> - Statement of mockery towards Tom Grice (see Appendix) indicating disagreement with his point of view or general intent to bust balls.  Designed to mimic the tone and phrasing of Gene Wilder&#8217;s performance as Willy Wonka during the climactic scene of Charlie and The Chocolate Factory.  Sometimes followed with &#8220;You STOLE Fizzy Lifting Drinks!  You bumped into the ceiling, with now has to be WASHED and STERILIZED, so you get NOTHING!  YOU LOSE!  GOOD DAY, SIR!&#8221;  Occasional additional retort of &#8220;I SAID GOOD DAY!&#8221; optional.</p>
<p><b>Appendix: Tom Grice</b> - Born 1972, Midwestern comic store manager, known for being outspoken in his opinions and acerbic in his humor.  Known as &#8220;The Earth-1 Matthew&#8221; and occasionally &#8220;Ultra Tommy,&#8221; has a comic pull list that can be seen from space.  Though often very thoughtful in his opinions, he is nonetheless <strong>WRONG,</strong> Sir!  <em><strong>WRONG!</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark I.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-27987</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-27987</guid>
		<description>Reminds you of Kirby?  I got more of a Giffen vibe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds you of Kirby?  I got more of a Giffen vibe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-27983</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-27983</guid>
		<description>I don't want to get in the middle of anything, but I believe that I've seen 'Tom Grice Is WRONG, Sir!  WRONG!" a good handful of times, and I have no idea what it means.  Therefore, I nominate it for the next entry into the Major Spoilers Dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to get in the middle of anything, but I believe that I&#8217;ve seen &#8216;Tom Grice Is WRONG, Sir!  WRONG!&#8221; a good handful of times, and I have no idea what it means.  Therefore, I nominate it for the next entry into the Major Spoilers Dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-27981</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-27981</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I challenge anyone to read this review, look at the art, story, NAMES, logic (or lack thereof) in the narrative, the coloring, etc. and explain to me why this book gets THREE STARS and Outsiders recieved 2.5.&lt;/i&gt;

The actual &lt;b&gt;critica&lt;/b&gt;l reasons why:

1.  Nexus left me with a dual feeling of dread (at Tyrone's actions) and elation (at the birth of Horato and Sundra's child.)  Outsiders left me vaguely disgusted that YET AGAIN a villain does something reprehensible and gets away, leaving two of the major players badly injured, with a slightly mitigating factor that Papa Batman is here to fire half the team and make it all better.  That emotional gut-response is usually what defines the star rating.

2. Nexus didn't have a full-page ad that undermined the NEXT FIVE ISSUES of the story, irritating me at DC for either trying to swerve me or once again giving secrets away ahead of time for no reason.  Without that stupid ad, Outsiders would probably have scored HIGHER than Nexus.  

3.  You may not like Steve Rude's art, and that's your right, but his action sequences are brilliantly designed, (like the missile attack on Sundra) reminding me of Kirby (in the first Elvonite/Alvinist confrontation ending in Nexus breaking it up telekinetically) and Toth (the confrontation between Tyrone and the Alvonites) as well as exhibiting striking design work (in the first shot where Horatio is in street clothes.)  

It wasn't my intent to pull your chain (Well, okay, maybe a LITTLE) with this review, but the gist is this: Nexus is a strange sci-fi political story with tortured emotional psychobabble barely wrapped up in a superhero facade.  It may not be your thing, you may not ever want it to be your thing.  And that is &lt;i&gt;absolutely&lt;/i&gt; your right...

But there's fine line between "I don't like it" and "It's not good."  I don't &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; Ed Brubaker's Daredevil, but that's really no reflection on the book.  It's just my take on it.  You and I have had a lot of comic discussions, and I don't think I'm wrong in saying that this is a case where you don't like &lt;i&gt;either&lt;/i&gt; the creator or the concept, and the next issue could be practically Shakespearian and come with six weeks of free Jenna Jameson oral action, and it wouldn't trip your trigger.  Maybe a man in a blue suit with a lighning bolt on it beat you as a child, I dunno. Regardless, by my own argument, your opinion is valid.

But I reserve the right to disagree, and I think this is a quality book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I challenge anyone to read this review, look at the art, story, NAMES, logic (or lack thereof) in the narrative, the coloring, etc. and explain to me why this book gets THREE STARS and Outsiders recieved 2.5.</i></p>
<p>The actual <b>critica</b>l reasons why:</p>
<p>1.  Nexus left me with a dual feeling of dread (at Tyrone&#8217;s actions) and elation (at the birth of Horato and Sundra&#8217;s child.)  Outsiders left me vaguely disgusted that YET AGAIN a villain does something reprehensible and gets away, leaving two of the major players badly injured, with a slightly mitigating factor that Papa Batman is here to fire half the team and make it all better.  That emotional gut-response is usually what defines the star rating.</p>
<p>2. Nexus didn&#8217;t have a full-page ad that undermined the NEXT FIVE ISSUES of the story, irritating me at DC for either trying to swerve me or once again giving secrets away ahead of time for no reason.  Without that stupid ad, Outsiders would probably have scored HIGHER than Nexus.  </p>
<p>3.  You may not like Steve Rude&#8217;s art, and that&#8217;s your right, but his action sequences are brilliantly designed, (like the missile attack on Sundra) reminding me of Kirby (in the first Elvonite/Alvinist confrontation ending in Nexus breaking it up telekinetically) and Toth (the confrontation between Tyrone and the Alvonites) as well as exhibiting striking design work (in the first shot where Horatio is in street clothes.)  </p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t my intent to pull your chain (Well, okay, maybe a LITTLE) with this review, but the gist is this: Nexus is a strange sci-fi political story with tortured emotional psychobabble barely wrapped up in a superhero facade.  It may not be your thing, you may not ever want it to be your thing.  And that is <i>absolutely</i> your right&#8230;</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s fine line between &#8220;I don&#8217;t like it&#8221; and &#8220;It&#8217;s not good.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t <i>like</i> Ed Brubaker&#8217;s Daredevil, but that&#8217;s really no reflection on the book.  It&#8217;s just my take on it.  You and I have had a lot of comic discussions, and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m wrong in saying that this is a case where you don&#8217;t like <i>either</i> the creator or the concept, and the next issue could be practically Shakespearian and come with six weeks of free Jenna Jameson oral action, and it wouldn&#8217;t trip your trigger.  Maybe a man in a blue suit with a lighning bolt on it beat you as a child, I dunno. Regardless, by my own argument, your opinion is valid.</p>
<p>But I reserve the right to disagree, and I think this is a quality book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grice</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm/#comment-27974</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1820.htm#comment-27974</guid>
		<description>This is your forum, and that is fine.  I accept that in your world, I am always wrong.  Cool.  But I challenge anyone to read this review, look at the art, story, NAMES, logic (or lack thereof) in the narrative, the coloring, etc. and explain to me why this book gets THREE STARS and Outsiders recieved 2.5.  I stand by my original point, and having read your review REALLY believe it now.  This book SUCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is your forum, and that is fine.  I accept that in your world, I am always wrong.  Cool.  But I challenge anyone to read this review, look at the art, story, NAMES, logic (or lack thereof) in the narrative, the coloring, etc. and explain to me why this book gets THREE STARS and Outsiders recieved 2.5.  I stand by my original point, and having read your review REALLY believe it now.  This book SUCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
