<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heroes For Hire #11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/</link>
	<description>We Know You Love Comics.  We Do Too.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Salieri</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25668</link>
		<dc:creator>Salieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25668</guid>
		<description>They should have Ant-Man and Blade join. That'd sort out hte obligatory Robot/Cyborg member...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have Ant-Man and Blade join. That&#8217;d sort out hte obligatory Robot/Cyborg member&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark I.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark I.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25648</guid>
		<description>Brent, that makes them even funnier to me.  I think they need to add a robot ninja that's constantly smoking and maybe have a laser coming out of Humbug's eye.  Oh, and give Black Cat a headband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent, that makes them even funnier to me.  I think they need to add a robot ninja that&#8217;s constantly smoking and maybe have a laser coming out of Humbug&#8217;s eye.  Oh, and give Black Cat a headband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25644</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25644</guid>
		<description>"Shang-Chi... WINS."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shang-Chi&#8230; WINS.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent F.</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25633</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25633</guid>
		<description>Scorpion's appearance kind of makes them all look like a group of Mortal Kombat rejects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scorpion&#8217;s appearance kind of makes them all look like a group of Mortal Kombat rejects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clay</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25618</link>
		<dc:creator>clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25618</guid>
		<description>"Hopefully I wasn’t too schmucky in my presumptions…"

not at all, i enjoy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hopefully I wasn’t too schmucky in my presumptions…&#8221;</p>
<p>not at all, i enjoy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salieri</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25575</link>
		<dc:creator>Salieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25575</guid>
		<description>However, I can't seem to get over how cool Humbug looks. Imagine...he used to be 'The Most Off-Beat Supervillain Yet"...

http://www.superdickery.com/images/stupor/3059_4_0019.jpg

...And NOW look at him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, I can&#8217;t seem to get over how cool Humbug looks. Imagine&#8230;he used to be &#8216;The Most Off-Beat Supervillain Yet&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.superdickery.com/images/stupor/3059_4_0019.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.superdickery.com/images/stupor/3059_4_0019.jpg</a></p>
<p>&#8230;And NOW look at him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25548</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 03:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25548</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;as the guy who drew the book i don’t even know who billie piper is.&lt;/i&gt;

She's a British actress/pop singer, apparently equivalent to a Britney Spears.  She does bear a resemblance to the face you've chosen for Black Cat...

&lt;img src="http://www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/06/billie_piper.jpg"/&gt;

&lt;i&gt;as for the “cheescake”.. i don’t picture myself as that kind of artist. your first example, i just chose a low shot and that’s what i could fit in . if it were chang there, it would be his bare chest. &lt;/i&gt;

As I said, I'm sure some of it is just me overreacting to the tempest in a teacup about issue #13's cover, certainly.  The fact that Bill Tucci and Al Rio are both known for drawing very voluptuous women may have given the book a bit of a reputation...  Given that Misty's costume was designed for maximum cleavage and abs certainly helps.

&lt;i&gt;as for the second example. i chose not to have faces in the shot. faces in every panel is boring. i don’t believe what i draw alone could lead to “cheesecake”. is it the book that has this image? other artist? #13 cover.idon’t know. maybe it’s on me, but i don’t see it.&lt;/i&gt;

Since you created the art in question and didn't intend the message I got, I'd say yes, the book has at least some of that image.  Certainly having four females in the tight catsuits shown can lead us down that particular path.  For me, the second example still reads a bit more quasi-sexual in body language than I might have expected, but that probably says more about me than your drawings.  Either way, thanks for giving us your perspective (Heh...) on the situation.  Hopefully I wasn't too schmucky in my presumptions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>as the guy who drew the book i don’t even know who billie piper is.</i></p>
<p>She&#8217;s a British actress/pop singer, apparently equivalent to a Britney Spears.  She does bear a resemblance to the face you&#8217;ve chosen for Black Cat&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/06/billie_piper.jpg"/></p>
<p><i>as for the “cheescake”.. i don’t picture myself as that kind of artist. your first example, i just chose a low shot and that’s what i could fit in . if it were chang there, it would be his bare chest. </i></p>
<p>As I said, I&#8217;m sure some of it is just me overreacting to the tempest in a teacup about issue #13&#8217;s cover, certainly.  The fact that Bill Tucci and Al Rio are both known for drawing very voluptuous women may have given the book a bit of a reputation&#8230;  Given that Misty&#8217;s costume was designed for maximum cleavage and abs certainly helps.</p>
<p><i>as for the second example. i chose not to have faces in the shot. faces in every panel is boring. i don’t believe what i draw alone could lead to “cheesecake”. is it the book that has this image? other artist? #13 cover.idon’t know. maybe it’s on me, but i don’t see it.</i></p>
<p>Since you created the art in question and didn&#8217;t intend the message I got, I&#8217;d say yes, the book has at least some of that image.  Certainly having four females in the tight catsuits shown can lead us down that particular path.  For me, the second example still reads a bit more quasi-sexual in body language than I might have expected, but that probably says more about me than your drawings.  Either way, thanks for giving us your perspective (Heh&#8230;) on the situation.  Hopefully I wasn&#8217;t too schmucky in my presumptions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clay</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25545</link>
		<dc:creator>clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 03:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25545</guid>
		<description>as the guy who drew the book i don't even know who billie piper is. as for the "cheescake".. i don't picture myself as that kind of artist. your first example, i just chose a low shot and that's what i could fit in . if it were chang there, it would be his bare chest. as for the second example. i chose not to have faces in the shot. faces in every panel is boring. i don't believe what i draw alone could lead to "cheesecake". is it the book that has this image? other artist? #13 cover.idon't know. maybe it's on me, but i don't see it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as the guy who drew the book i don&#8217;t even know who billie piper is. as for the &#8220;cheescake&#8221;.. i don&#8217;t picture myself as that kind of artist. your first example, i just chose a low shot and that&#8217;s what i could fit in . if it were chang there, it would be his bare chest. as for the second example. i chose not to have faces in the shot. faces in every panel is boring. i don&#8217;t believe what i draw alone could lead to &#8220;cheesecake&#8221;. is it the book that has this image? other artist? #13 cover.idon&#8217;t know. maybe it&#8217;s on me, but i don&#8217;t see it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25538</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 03:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25538</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My enjoyment of this title is ruined in that the Penciller can’t seem to stop basign Black Cat on Billie Piper. NO-ONE shoudl EVER be based on Billie Piper. It just is NOT pretty.&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe I lack the British context on Billie, but I can tell you this:  Rose Tyler is smokin' hot.  Inhumanly so...  Third best-looking Doctor Who companion ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My enjoyment of this title is ruined in that the Penciller can’t seem to stop basign Black Cat on Billie Piper. NO-ONE shoudl EVER be based on Billie Piper. It just is NOT pretty.</i></p>
<p>Maybe I lack the British context on Billie, but I can tell you this:  Rose Tyler is smokin&#8217; hot.  Inhumanly so&#8230;  Third best-looking Doctor Who companion ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salieri</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25477</link>
		<dc:creator>Salieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/1702.htm/#comment-25477</guid>
		<description>My enjoyment of this title is ruined in that the Penciller can't seem to stop basign Black Cat on Billie Piper. NO-ONE shoudl EVER be based on Billie Piper. It just is NOT pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My enjoyment of this title is ruined in that the Penciller can&#8217;t seem to stop basign Black Cat on Billie Piper. NO-ONE shoudl EVER be based on Billie Piper. It just is NOT pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
