If you believe it. Sounds like a hoax, especially when he starts to complain that the special effects community doesn’t get a share of profits of the film. Almost like someone someone doesn’t know the difference between an Above the Line and Below the Line position.
Related posts
7 Responses to “Who Leaked Wolverine Online? This Guy Did”
Leave a Reply
- Review: The Flash – Rebirth #5 (of 6)
- Review: Dr. Horrible
- Review: Disney Christmas Classics
- Review: Batman #693
- Review: S.W.O.R.D. #1
- Review: Nola #1
- Review: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly #5
- Review: Batgirl #4
- Review: Green Lantern Corps #42
- Dueling Reviews: Zorro #17
- Review: Locke & Key: Crown of Shadows #1
- Review: Immortal Weapons #4 (of 5)
- Review: The Great Ten #1 (of 10)
- Review: Blackbeard, Legend of the Pyrate King #2
- Review: Batman/Doc Savage Special #1
- MSP#152: The Truth about Doctor True, and Other Amazin’ Tales
- Critical Hit #21 – How the other half live – Part 2
- MSP#151: Interview: Matt Sturges
- MSP#150: Yeah, we can’t believe it either…
- Critical Hit #20: How the Other Half Live
- MSP#149: Interview: Caleb Monroe
- MSP#148: The Super Future Friends Pay a Visit
- MSP#147: Favorite Doctor Who Episodes
- Critical Hit #19: Adventurer’s Vault 2
- MSP#146: Parker: The Hunter, can’t lose
- Critical Hit #18: Aboard the Airship!
- Major Spoilers Podcast #145: Doctor Who is Missing
- Thanks again! Critical Hit, hits front page of iTunes Podcasts
- Thank you for making Critical Hit, a hit!
- Major Spoilers Desktop Background…

Action Figures Animation Archie Comics art Art Appreciation Moment of the Day Avengers Batman Battlestar Galactica Betty Boom Studios Buffy the Vampire Slayer Captain America cartoon Civil War comic convention Contest Cosplay CW Dark Horse Comics DC Diamond Comic Distributors Diamond Select Toys Disney Doctor Who DVD Dynamite Entertainment Fan Film Fantastic Four Featured Final Crisis From the Editor Gaming Green Lantern Heroes Hero History Hulk Humor IDW Publishing Image Comics Interviews Invincible Iron Man Justice League of America Legion of Super Heroes Major Spoilers Major Spoilers Podcast Mark Waid Marvel Movies Music NBC New Comic Releases New York Comic Con Oni Press Podcast Poll Press Release Preview Radical Publishing Red Sonja Reprint Retro Review Review san diego Secret Invasion Skrullapalooza Smallville Sneak Peek Solicitations Spider-Man Star Trek Star Wars statues Superman Television The Dark Knight The Darkness Thor Top Cow Toys Trade Paperback Trailer Transformers Variant Veronica Video Warner Bros. Watchmen webcomic web comics Witchblade Wolverine Wonder Woman X-Men Zenescope Entertainment Zombies










wow. socialism at its finest.
Fake. Probably.
That’s not fair wah wah wah Hugh Jackman is making more money than me. Gimme gimme me me me me me that’s not fair that’s not fair
Poozer.
you know with his mannerisms and his voice one could easily pick him out.
but nonetheless!
he stuck it to the man…i was hoping he was going to say he did it because the movie is crappy…which i believe.
the wolverine origins movie is a step above fantastic snore.
Another youtube celebrity rises upon the acts of others.
I agree.
Poozer.
I smell hoax.
But if it’s real, i have a few points:
1. It’s not like they were fooled to believe that they were going to get a share of the profits then sudden told otherwise. You knew the stipulations when you took the job. You knew that no matter how much work you did on a film’s effects, you were going to get paid your normal pay rate regardless.
2. If the CG effects industry is really this pissed that they aren’t getting a slice of the profit pie, or they are being unfairly treated, you could always organize into a union and strike. I for one would love to see it. Because then filmmakers would have 2 options: A) give into the demands and give the effects companies a percentage of the profits of the film because, let’s face it, the majority of the blockbuster movies from the last 15 years have relied heavily on CG to get the job done. Or there’s option B) Filmmakers and production companies actually make an effort to make engrossing cinema without relying on CG to accomplish what they can’t/don’t have the energy to figure out how to do practically.
Option A would give the CG companies what they believe is their fair share of the profit of a successful movie (or the reprocussions of a flop), while option B would result in a return to relying on well-written scripts, talented acting and visionary direction that was needed for a hugely successful flick way back when before the advent of CG effects.
I can understand where he’s coming from, but it seems to me that post-production wizards would command a much higher salary than the low figures he mentioned. $35-40k a year seems very low for their expertise.
If this is legit at all, I’ll be surprised.
for the average sfx people 35k-40k per year is about average.