<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Supergirl #40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/</link>
	<description>We know you love comics. We do, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keller</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-117522</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-117522</guid>
		<description>Heh heh. Vapid?  Do you mean a cheerleader who is dull, or self obsessed? I think people often assume it means something akin to skanky (although you didn&#039;t say that).

Still, I gotta say I like the look of Superwoman&#039;s rags in this case. She&#039;s sleeker, and her outfit looks more like something an olympics competitor (minus logo) might wear. Compare this version of Supergirl to the one Kotobukiya came out with for their statue. Better?

Actually why not have &quot;front-cover butt-shot close ups&quot; of BOTH male and female characters? They do &quot;Variant&quot; covers out the you-know-what already.

Would women really buy more? Is their disinterest -truly- because of the banality of some titles, or do &quot;they&quot; even care? What do the numbers say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh heh. Vapid?  Do you mean a cheerleader who is dull, or self obsessed? I think people often assume it means something akin to skanky (although you didn&#8217;t say that).</p>
<p>Still, I gotta say I like the look of Superwoman&#8217;s rags in this case. She&#8217;s sleeker, and her outfit looks more like something an olympics competitor (minus logo) might wear. Compare this version of Supergirl to the one Kotobukiya came out with for their statue. Better?</p>
<p>Actually why not have &#8220;front-cover butt-shot close ups&#8221; of BOTH male and female characters? They do &#8220;Variant&#8221; covers out the you-know-what already.</p>
<p>Would women really buy more? Is their disinterest -truly- because of the banality of some titles, or do &#8220;they&#8221; even care? What do the numbers say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainypirate</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116637</link>
		<dc:creator>brainypirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116637</guid>
		<description>and we wonder why more women don&#039;t read comics....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and we wonder why more women don&#8217;t read comics&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duckface</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116564</link>
		<dc:creator>duckface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116564</guid>
		<description>Because the vast majority of comic book readers are guys, and guys would feel uncomfortable buying books with close-ups of toned male bums on the cover. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the vast majority of comic book readers are guys, and guys would feel uncomfortable buying books with close-ups of toned male bums on the cover. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainypirate</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116487</link>
		<dc:creator>brainypirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116487</guid>
		<description>How come we don&#039;t get front-cover butt-shot close-ups of Green Lantern or Nightwing or Jay Garrick or -- well, you get the idea.....  :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come we don&#8217;t get front-cover butt-shot close-ups of Green Lantern or Nightwing or Jay Garrick or &#8212; well, you get the idea&#8230;..  :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shamon</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116476</link>
		<dc:creator>shamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116476</guid>
		<description>lana problems are due to her being the queen bee in the superman books .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lana problems are due to her being the queen bee in the superman books .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricco</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116427</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116427</guid>
		<description>@Wyntermute: Lana&#039;s cought and nosebleed started in Supergirl 38 (Origins and Omens story), so we can assume the condition pre-dates the party.

@Stephen: “Was Superwoman’s mask made of lead?” , yes it&#039;s made of lead, the issue is addressed on panel in Supergirl 36.

Supergirl: &quot;But who are you really? And why can&#039;t I see through your mask? Is that lead?&quot;
Superwoman: &quot;Well, we all have secrets to keep and people to protect, don&#039;t we?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Wyntermute: Lana&#8217;s cought and nosebleed started in Supergirl 38 (Origins and Omens story), so we can assume the condition pre-dates the party.</p>
<p>@Stephen: “Was Superwoman’s mask made of lead?” , yes it&#8217;s made of lead, the issue is addressed on panel in Supergirl 36.</p>
<p>Supergirl: &#8220;But who are you really? And why can&#8217;t I see through your mask? Is that lead?&#8221;<br />
Superwoman: &#8220;Well, we all have secrets to keep and people to protect, don&#8217;t we?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~wyntermute~</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116421</link>
		<dc:creator>~wyntermute~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116421</guid>
		<description>Lana&#039;s nosebleed had me flipping backwards in the book to see if she had been drinking anything at the &quot;party&quot;-thing.  My first thought on that was, &quot;poison? Hmmmm... who slipped her what, when?&quot; and then I started my rewind-flipping.  I will also &#039;fess up and say I had not picked the Other Lane as being any more involved in things than was previously established (a.k.a., on the edges of plot, simply a minor annoyance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lana&#8217;s nosebleed had me flipping backwards in the book to see if she had been drinking anything at the &#8220;party&#8221;-thing.  My first thought on that was, &#8220;poison? Hmmmm&#8230; who slipped her what, when?&#8221; and then I started my rewind-flipping.  I will also &#8216;fess up and say I had not picked the Other Lane as being any more involved in things than was previously established (a.k.a., on the edges of plot, simply a minor annoyance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duckface</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116392</link>
		<dc:creator>duckface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116392</guid>
		<description>I thought Linda Danvers would be Flamebird. Still pissed that isn&#039;t the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Linda Danvers would be Flamebird. Still pissed that isn&#8217;t the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricco</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116295</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116295</guid>
		<description>I thought the sickeness of Lana Lang was supposed to mean that she was the one inside the Superwoman suit and that it was killing her, it was a nice twist that both stories were not related. I find it interesting that the current tv plotline (Lana with Clarks power thanks to a suit) is being used at the same time in the comic, I&#039;m probably wrong but I think it&#039;s the first time the comic borrows a storyline from the tv show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the sickeness of Lana Lang was supposed to mean that she was the one inside the Superwoman suit and that it was killing her, it was a nice twist that both stories were not related. I find it interesting that the current tv plotline (Lana with Clarks power thanks to a suit) is being used at the same time in the comic, I&#8217;m probably wrong but I think it&#8217;s the first time the comic borrows a storyline from the tv show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116205</link>
		<dc:creator>jerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116205</guid>
		<description>And i do agree Linda Danvers should most definitely come back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And i do agree Linda Danvers should most definitely come back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116200</link>
		<dc:creator>jerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116200</guid>
		<description>@Salieri so superwoman was Plastic Man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Salieri so superwoman was Plastic Man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116102</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116102</guid>
		<description>yeah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salieri</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116095</link>
		<dc:creator>Salieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116095</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a wise man, Jerado. Have you seen that final reveal page? It turns out Major Lane was Superwoman while also being Plastic Man.

Additionally...despite the good job that this creative team has attempted, despite the New Krypton tie-in, despite that Justice League upcoming...I sorely miss Peter David&#039;s Supergirl. She might have been an Angel-cum-pink-alien-blob, but she had a strong character and was written with great intelligence and didn&#039;t do things like preaching about love to parents of cancerous children while dressed in an outfit that would make the most vapid of cheerleaders retch uncontrollably for hours.

Comeback, Linda Danvers...all is forgiven...come back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a wise man, Jerado. Have you seen that final reveal page? It turns out Major Lane was Superwoman while also being Plastic Man.</p>
<p>Additionally&#8230;despite the good job that this creative team has attempted, despite the New Krypton tie-in, despite that Justice League upcoming&#8230;I sorely miss Peter David&#8217;s Supergirl. She might have been an Angel-cum-pink-alien-blob, but she had a strong character and was written with great intelligence and didn&#8217;t do things like preaching about love to parents of cancerous children while dressed in an outfit that would make the most vapid of cheerleaders retch uncontrollably for hours.</p>
<p>Comeback, Linda Danvers&#8230;all is forgiven&#8230;come back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerardo</title>
		<link>http://www.majorspoilers.com/archives/13925.htm/#comment-116068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.majorspoilers.com/?p=13925#comment-116068</guid>
		<description>id pick supergirl up if the interior art was have as good as the covers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id pick supergirl up if the interior art was have as good as the covers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
